Memory Performance:
  
  
    - 
      Sapphire CrossFireX 790FX
    
 
    - 
      Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DQ6
    
 
    - 
      MSI K9A2 CF
    
 
    - 
      Asus M2N32-SLI
    
 
  
  
  
  
 
  
  
    - 
      Sapphire CrossFireX 790FX
    
 
    - 
      Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DQ6
    
 
    - 
      MSI K9A2 CF
    
 
    - 
      Asus M2N32-SLI
    
 
  
  
  nanoseconds (lower is better)
 
  
  
    - 
      Sapphire CrossFireX 790FX
    
 
    - 
      Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DQ6
    
 
    - 
      MSI K9A2 CF
    
 
    - 
      Asus M2N32-SLI
    
 
  
  
    
      - 
        
          7166.3
        
       
      - 
        
          6644.3
        
       
      - 
        
          7284.2
        
       
      - 
        
          7316.8
        
       
    
    
      
        0
      
      
        1000
      
      
        2000
      
      
        3000
      
      
        4000
      
      
        5000
      
      
        6000
      
      
        7000
      
      
        8000
      
     
   
  MB/s
 
  
  
    - 
      Sapphire CrossFireX 790FX
    
 
    - 
      Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DQ6
    
 
    - 
      MSI K9A2 CF
    
 
    - 
      Asus M2N32-SLI
    
 
  
  
    
    
      
        0
      
      
        10
      
      
        20
      
      
        30
      
      
        40
      
      
        50
      
      
        60
      
      
        70
      
      
        80
      
      
        90
      
     
   
  nanoseconds (lower is better)
 
1T was also unattainable for stable running – in the end we could only squeeze out 3-3-3-10-18-2T from our memory which is 
nearly the fastest we can run it at, although not quite.
The Everest results reflect this with a marginally slower latency and slightly lower raw memory performance. The SiSoft results are a little different, showing an equally high raw memory performance but very low memory latency.
    
 
    
    
        
            
Want to comment? Please log in.